Almsgiving
Perhaps the first question which would present itself to an
uninitiated reader is the constant reference to the offering of food to the
Buddha and his disciples by their lay supporters. Why is there so little
reference to feeding the poor, for example? According to the Buddha, charity in
the form of giving to the needy is indeed praiseworthy and is certainly
encouraged.
There are numerous stories in some other Buddhist books which tell
us how important it is to support the poor and the needy. Anatha Pindika the
philanthropist-supporter and disciple of the Buddha was one of them. His very
name means 'Feeder of the Poor'. Members of the community of monks however, are
the teachers of the Dhamma, and by enabling them to lead a pure and noble life,
the lay devotee is helping to sustain the Essential Teachings.
Sustaining the custodians of the Dhamma is considered a more
meritorious undertaking than merely feeding the hungry. Therefore, Buddhist
devotees, while supporting the needy, tend to pay more attention to providing
requisites to religious and holy people so that these holy men can concentrate
solely on the development of purity and doing some service to the public.
Those who have renounced to seek spiritual development are not
actively concerned about their personal needs and it is the duty of the devotee
to care for them. In this way the lay devotee is partaking in spiritual
activities on a larger scale. The offering of food and other requisites is
traditionally followed by the giving of a sermon by the monks on some aspect of
the Teaching which will help the listener in his quest for understanding and
wisdom. Helping the poor ensures one's physical well-being, but sustaining the
spiritually well-endowed creates the environment for spiritual development
which is the Buddhist ideal.
It must be noted that the Buddha did not encourage the support of
Buddhist monks alone, but of any holy, spiritually superior being who is
sincere and who teaches with Right View. When Buddhist monks themselves earned
bad reputations after the violation of their precepts, the Dhammapada records
how certain townsfolk withdrew such support until they mended their ways. The
offering is made worthy because it is done with full confidence and given with
a pure mind to one who receives with an equally pure mind.
The stories in this book are mainly about members of the Holy
Order which was established by the Buddha. This is natural, because
renunciation was considered an important first step for anyone who was really
concerned about seeking a way out of repeated existence (births and deaths). The
Buddha's advice therefore, was generally aimed at the members of the Sangha who
were closely associated with him. In this connection we may also wonder why
there has been so much attention given to the robes worn by the monks. We are
told about the talk generated among the monks when Devadatta was awarded a new
set of robes and about a monk who was even reborn as an insect because he was
unduly attached to the robes. Here we must remember that we are dealing with
the social and economic circumstances in India 2500 years ago. There were many
people who had become ascetics and who depended on the generosity of lay people
for their requisites. Naturally, it was not an easy thing to receive a set of
robes and those who were spiritually backward would have experienced much
jealousy when others received these requisites which were so hard to come by.
It is only the Arahants who are totally unconcerned about whether the materials
they receive are expensive or whether they receive anything at all.
Achema - 2005
No comments:
Post a Comment