Elementary Lessons on Karma
by Annie Besant
Published in 1912 and 1919
Theosophical Publishing House,
Adyar, Chennai [Madras] India
The Theosophist Office, Adyar,
Madras. India
FEW questions, perhaps, puzzle students more, whether the
students be old or young, than that of Karma. What is it ? when did it begin ?
how far does it limit us ? are we its servants or its masters ? must we fold
our hands meekly before it, or struggle vigorously against it ? if today grows
out of yesterday, and yesterday out of the day before, and so on, backwards and
backwards, how can the bad man ever become good ? are we not really compelled
by an iron necessity, are we not " dumb, driven cattle," who cannot
become heroes, whatever poets may say ?
We may spend a little time usefully in thinking over these
questions and others resembling them, for here, as elsewhere, " a little
knowledge is a dangerous thing ". Karma is but too often a crippling
fetter instead of being, as it ought to be, a strength, a guide, a force,
enabling us to act wisely and well. Like all other laws in nature, it binds the
ignorant and gives power to the wise.
Here is our first step: Karma is a Law of Nature. We might
go further, and say: It is the law. For it is everywhere and always —
omnipresent, all-pervasive. Other names are given to it in the West, and the
names are useful, because they are not surrounded by all the traditions and
discussions which blur the meaning of karma in the East. The Western philosopher
calls it The Law of Causation. He [Page 2] sees in every happening a double
fact — it is both an effect and a cause; it is an effect, for it has a cause; something went before and made this thing to happen; it is
also a cause; for it will generate a new happening, another thing will arise
from it. As a man is a son of his father, and is also the father of his son; as
his father was a son to his own father, and as his son will be a father to his
own son in turn, so is it with causes and effects; each event is at once an
effect and a cause — an effect of the past, a cause of the future. This
observed succession, this invariable relation, is generalized under the term,
the law of causation. The human intellect recognizes this law as fundamental,
and sees in it the assurance of stability and order as well as of human
progress.
We are continually causing effects, unconsciously and
consciously. The more we understand our power and nature's conditions, the more
can we bring about the effects we desire, and prevent the events we dislike. The Western scientist calls karma, The Law of Action and
Re-action, and he also sees it as a fundamental law. Action and Re-action are
equal and opposite, he says. You push an object; its resistance is its
re-action against your push; you fling an elastic ball against a board; it
springs back to you with a force proportional to that of the impact. Everywhere
in nature he finds this law, and he counts on it with certainty in his
manipulations of objects.
In both these Western terms the word Law appears. What is a
Law — a Law of Nature ? It is the statement of an observed succession, of an
invariable sequence; it may be put as a formula; wherever A and B are, there C
follows. Hence it is a statement of conditions, and the result which arises
from [Page 3] them. It is not a command; it does not say "Do this, or Do
not do this," like a human enactment. It does not say: " You must
have A and B, and therefore C; " but rather: " If you want C, you
must bring A and B together; if you do not want C, you must take care that A
and B do not come together; if you keep A away from B, you will not have
C." Hence a law of nature is truly said to be not a compelling but an
enabling force; it tells you the conditions which enable you to produce or avoid
a particular thing, and is only compulsory in this sense, that if you make the
conditions you must have the result. Because of this inevitable sequence
ignorant people are helpless in the grip of natural laws; they ignorantly
produce conditions, and the results hurtle around them, confuse and crush them.
As we gain knowledge, we take care as to the conditions we produce, and thus
avoid undesirable results.
A law of Nature is said to be inviolable, for this relation
between cause and effect cannot be altered. We can disregard natural laws as
much as we please, but the law breaks us; we do not break it. If you slip off
the top of a building and fall heavily to the ground, you do not break the law
of attraction, or gravitation; you disregard it, and your fall proves its
truth; a well known formula gives the velocity with which you will strike the
ground.
We partly answer, then, our first question, " what is
karma?" by the statement: karma is a law of nature of universal validity,
called in the West the law of causation, or the law of action and re-action.
The remainder of the answer to the question, " what is
karma ? " is very closely connected with the second question: " When
did karma begin ? " A general law of nature cannot be said to have either
a beginning, or an ending; wherever there is any [Page 4] manifestation, any
universe, any world, there, general laws are also present, inherent in the very
nature of things. Attraction of one mass of matter to another cannot be said to
begin; wherever there are masses of matter, there, attraction is working;
gravitation does not begin, it is ever manifested where the conditions for its
working are present. Hence karma, being, a general Law, is said to be eternal;
it is a condition of manifested existence, and wherever existence is
manifested, there is karma.
Hence the question: " When did karma begin ? "
shows a misconception of the very nature of karma; it is a perpetual condition
of existence in matter, neither beginning nor ending, but eternal. If the form
of the question be modified, and it is asked: " When did the karma of a
particular creature begin ? " then the answer is: "At the time at
which that particular creature came into manifestation." When the unborn,
undying Spirit takes to himself a vesture of matter, then he steps into
conditions, and comes under the law of karma. His stepping into the conditions
begins his particular karma. At first it will be the karma of a mineral, the
play upon him of surrounding force and matter, and the re-action from him on
his surroundings. These actions and re-actions weave the links of his karma,
and the chain draws him into one or another type of the vegetable kingdom. In
that, as his re-action becomes more complex, the web of karma attaching to him
becomes more complicated, and ultimately lifts him into some animal type. In
the animal kingdom his increasing sentiency enters into karmic causes, and
pains inflicted by him re-act as pains on him. But the feeling of pain is due
to the evolution of the power to feel in him; it is still action and re-action,
but where in the mineral these were unaccompanied by [Page 5] feeling, in the
animal, feeling results in pleasure and pain: the law is the same; the creature
is different, and so the result on the creature is different. As reason develops,
another stand is added to the karmic web, and the action in the thought world
is added to that in the acting and feeling worlds, and hence another powerful
factor is added to the reaction. But once again, the law of action and reaction
is working on the same lines.
If the student will constantly bear in mind that karma is
action and re-action, and that this works on every plane of nature, works
everywhere and always, and is inherent in the nature of things, many of his
difficulties will disappear; he will understand that karma begins for him when
he descends into the universe of matter, because he has come into the
conditions in which karma is perpetually working, and that the re-actions on
him are exactly equal to his actions, containing more or fewer factors
according to those which have gone out from himself.
Another thing that will become clear to him is that the
re-action must be of the same nature as the action; hence when a man commits a
mistaken act with a good motive, his action is on three planes, the physical,
the astral and the mental; the re-action must also be on three planes; the
mental re-action will be on his character, which will be improved by the impact
of good upon it; the astral re-action will make for him future opportunity of exercising
right desire; both these will be good; but the re-action upon the physical
plane of the mistaken act will be misfortune to himself. Thus the law works
with perfect accuracy and inviolability, and the re-action upon each action
follows in unvarying succession.[Page 6] The idea of rewards and punishments
ought not to be allowed to enter into the workings of karmic law.
We have results, consequences, but neither rewards nor
punishments. Pain is the outcome of wrong activity on any plane, not because anyone
inflicts pain upon us as a punishment, but because we have flung ourselves
against the law and are bruised against its unyieldingness. The result of
virtuous thought or feeling is an increase of the capacity to be virtuous; it
is not prosperity, either in this world or another. If we tell a lie, the
result is the increased tendency to falsehood, the lowering of our character,
and this is an invariable result, not affected by the discovery or otherwise of
our falsity by those around us; their want of trust is the re-action from their
discovery of our lie; the re-action on us of the increased tendency to
falsehood is independent of this secondary result.
"How far does the law of karma limit us?" — such
is the question now to be considered, and it falls naturally into two parts:
(1) The limiting action of laws of nature, of which karma is one; (2) The
limiting action of the special karma which each one of us has generated in the
past.
1. We have already seen that a law
of nature is a equence of conditions, and the conditions among which we find
ourselves impose upon us certain limitations. Thus a man cannot fly under
ordinary conditions, and if he desires to travel through the air he must supply
himself with some apparatus by which he can rise into the air and move therein.
The more we know of the natural forces around us, the greater is our freedom of
movement amongst them, for we can balance one against the other, neutralizing
those which are opposed to any course which we wish [Page 7] to take. If we
wish to descend from a tower to the ground by jumping from the top, the
conditions are such as to result in the fracture of our bones if we merely jump
into the air; but if we arm ourselves with a parachute of sufficient size, we
may safely launch ourselves into the air, and float gradually down to the
earth. Again, we cannot rise above the atmosphere, and long before reaching its
upper regions we should find the air too rare to be respirable; here is a
limiting condition; but, on the other hand, we could overcome this limitation
by taking with us a supply of respirable air. The power of natural conditions
to limit us can very largely be overcome by knowledge, and the larger our
knowledge the more Exactly the same is true with regard to the universal conditions
called karma; we are limited by them as by the other conditions found in
nature, but can neutralize or transcend these to a great extent by knowledge.
Hence the enormous importance of studying and understanding the general karmic
conditions, since our freedom is proportionate to our knowledgefreely can we
act.
2. Of more pressing and immediate
importance is the limiting action of the special karma which each oneof us has
generated in the past, and an understanding of this is vital for the welfare of
our life and the control of our conduct. This understanding will best be gained
by a study of the working of karma along the three lines of character,
opportunity and circumstances, generated by the three aspects of consciousness
— thought, desire, and activity. In the whole of this study it must be
remembered that we, who created this karma by our thought, desire and activity
in the past, are the same thinking, desiring and acting consciousness in the
present; people think too much of karma as reaction on them, and not [Page 8]
sufficiently of their own action upon karmic conditions; we modify the outcome
of past thinkings by present thinking, of past desires by present desire, of
past actings by present acting. Kârmic action is not on an inert wall, but on a
living consciousness, which reacts on karma and modifies it by that reaction. The passive endurance of karma is seen, and not the active
impact upon it; thus a one-sided and inadequate view is taken, and man is
paralyzed when he ought to be energizing.
An examination of each of the lines above-mentioned will
enable us clearly to see how far karma limits us.
Thought makes character, such is the familiar and true
statement. "As a man thinks, so he becomes." Thought makes
character, such is the familiar and true statement. "As a man thinks, so
he becomes." The character built up by thought in past lives is born
with us in the present life. That we cannot escape, and it is a clear
limitation. Let us say that we are born with poor mental abilities; these limit
our capacity for acquiring knowledge, and we find ourselves compelled to spend
two or three hours in mastering a lesson that our clever neighbour learns in
ten minutes. There is a fact, a limitation, which undoubtedly exists. How can
we deal with it ? For the present we acquiesce in the fact; it is our karma.
But, if we know the law, we shall at once begin to exercise our faculties, such
as they are, to the full : we shall exert ourselves to the utmost, making up in
time what we lack in power. Gradually the limits begin to widen out; thought is
exerting its creative power, and our faculties improve under our strenuous
cultivation.
Accepting the limitation imposed by our poor thinking in
the past, we sedulously work at its extension by better thinking now, and thus
build up gradually an improved mental equipment for use in the future. Or we
may have [Page 9] been born with an irritable temper; contrasting ourselves
with a sweet-tempered neighbour, we are keenly conscious of our inferiority;
again we feel our karmic limitation. But again we decline to sit down passively
within it; we determinedly think patience, until at last we have created it as
a faculty, and it becomes our habitual self-expression. Karma may hand on to us
our wages for the past in the form of limitations, but karma cannot keep us
within that area if we resolutely determine to break them down; within those
limits we must begin, but we can change them by the very force which created
them.
Desire, makes opportunity: such is the second familiar law.
We may have been born clever, but opportunity to show our ability may be
lacking; or we may make efforts which fail of success through bad luck rather
than through defective workmanship. Clearly we are here hemmed in by a
limitation; karma is frustrating our endeavours. Here, again, we must meet the
limitation by resistant and persevering effort; we must back up our effort by
strong desire, and will the success which eludes our grasp. Gradually we shall
create opportunities and conquer our fate, and the limitations will widen out
and the obstacles disappear.
Action makes circumstances is the third law. Most difficult
of all are the limitations imposed by circumstances; but these also may slowly
be changed. The best way is to accept them cheerfully and bravely, adapting
ourselves within the limitations from which at first we cannot escape, but
keeping up against them a quiet steady pressure, which slowly modifies them.
Above all, we should try to increase the happiness of those around us, thinking
little of our own, for past selfishness has made present misfortune, and the
changing of the cause will bring about a changed [Page 10] effect. Within the
present evil live sow the seed of future good, and within the limitations made
by the past we create freedom for the future.
We will next consider the bearing on this question of
Bhîshrna's famous phrase : Exertion is greater than Destiny. Past exertions have made present destiny,
present destiny may be changed by fresh exertions. A study of the conditions of
such changing will complete our answer to the question: " How far does the
law of karma limit us ? "
We have seen that thought makes character . We look at our
own character, and we see that we are deficient in truth, courage and
gentleness. How shall we supply this deficiency since it is our karma to be
untruthful, timid, and irritable. Thought is our tool for building up what we
lack. Every morning we sit down quietly for five minutes and we think about
truth. We say to ourselves: "Truth is Brahman; everything rests on truth.
In my real Self I am truth, for I am divine. My mind, my body, must express my
real Self. Today, I will think truthfully and accurately. I will say
nothing untrue. I will do nothing that makes a false impression. 0 Thou who art
Truth, and art my Self, shine out in me as Truth, and help me to be true."
Then, during the day, we try to be on our guard against thinking, speaking, or
acting untruthfully.
If we exaggerate anything, our morning thought will come up
in the mind, and we shall at once feel that we have been untruthful. In such a
case, we should deliberately and openly correct the false statement, though we
shall feel a little bit ashamed of ourselves in doing so, and this will make us
more careful next time. Thus we should go on, day after [Page 11] day, week after
week, until we have established a habit of truthfulness in thought, word and
deed, and we find, to our delight, that we are instinctively truthful, and the
deficiency has vanished, the virtue of truth is ours.
Then we begin, all over again, to build up courage. We
think about it in the morning, we practise it during the day. When we feel
timid we say to ourselves: "Brahman is fearless, my Self is fearless; my
mind and body must be brave." We read about brave people, and dwell on the
value of courage. If we see a child or an animal ill-used, we do not slink out
of the way, and say: "It is not my business." We go boldly up, and
speak gently but firmly to the cruel person, and try to protect the helpless
creature he is ill-using. After a time we find that timidity has
disappeared, and we have become courageous.
Then we begin again once more to substitute gentleness for
irritability; we think on gentleness every morning, we practice it during the
day. If a person speaks to us sharply, and our irritable temper starts up all
aflame, we force ourselves to be silent, not to answer back; when we can do
this without effort, then we begin to answer gently, to soothe the ruffled
feelings of the other, until at last we can bear any annoyance without
impatience or irritation.
Another very good way of thinking in the morning, is to
imagine ourselves perfectly truthful, or perfectly brave, or perfectly gentle.
The imagination creates, and we become the model of the virtue which we have
imagined ourselves to be. We think of ourselves as the very perfect knight,
truthful, brave and gentle, and we become that which we think. By this use of
the law of thought we have created new karma, and it has become our karma to be
truthful, courageous, gentle. We have established this as our [Page 12] settled
character, and we shall be born with it when we return to earth next time.
Karma may compel us to bring with us into the world a nature which is
untruthful, timid and irritable, but it cannot compel us to keep that nature.
We can what we will, and karma will give a truthful, brave and gentle nature,
if we set going the causes which produce it; karma is merely result, and as the
one character is the inevitable result of certain causes, so is the other
character the equally inevitable result if we choose to set going the
appropriate causes.
We have seen that desire makes opportunity. We think
carefully and quietly of the things which will be really useful to us, choosing
the more permanent as against the less permanent, the intellectual and
emotional as against the physical. Then we deliberately set ourselves to desire
the most desirable objects. We desire them steadily, perseveringly, and we
watch for the opportunities which our desire is making for us, and seize them
as they present themselves. But let us remember that the law works
unswervingly, and that we shall inevitably find falling into our hands the
opportunity we have resolutely created, bringing with it the desired object. If
ill-chosen, it will bring disappointment not satisfaction, sorrow not joy.
Nature pays over results, indifferent to their nature, and it is for us to
choose as we will.
Hence the warning : Take heed how ye pray.
We have seen also that action makes circumstances, and that
we lie in beds of our own making. A careful consideration of the relation
between our character and our circumstances will teach us how best we may
utilize the environment from which we cannot escape. While we diligently try to
spread happiness round us, we should take advantage of the conditions to [Page
13] develop qualities we lack.
From ill-health we may cull the sweet flowers of
cheerfulness and patience; from household cares we may learn tenderness, and
develop executive ability; from the drudgery of daily toil we may learn
endurance; from anxiety we may evolve fortitude and serenity. The knower of
karma turns everything to account and, like a strong and skillful workman, he
shapes his future. Karma conditions us, but we are its creators, and in
proportion to our knowledge is our control.
The little group of questions remaining is really answered
in essence by what has been said, but we may run over certain additional
details. " Are we the servants of karma, or its masters ? Must we fold our
hands meekly before it, or struggle vigorously against it ? If today grows out
of yesterday, and yesterday out of the day before, and so on, backwards and
backwards, how can the bad man ever become good ? are we not really
compelled by an iron necessity ? "
The first question of this group we may pass as already
answered: we are partly servants, partly masters— servants by what remains in
us of ignorance, masters by all the powers we gain by knowledge. The second
question, however, raises an important point. Suppose we find ourselves in the
grip of an overwhelming force and any struggle against it is doomed to failure,
is there any use in struggling ?
Every use, as a little thought will show. Let us take a bad
physical habit, brought over from the past — drunkenness or sexual sensuality.
The man who does not understand karma, says despairingly: "I cannot help
it," and he yields without a struggle, and thus weaves another strand into
the rope of vice that binds him, making it stronger than before. The man who
understands karma says: "It may be that [Page 14] I cannot help it, but I
am going to fight against it for as long as I can, even if I have to succumb in
the end. He makes a gallant fight against his enemy; beaten at last
by the overwhelming force of his past, he sinks again into the vice; but his noble
struggle has broken many strands of that strong rope of evil karma, and when
again his foe assails him, the rope will bind him less securely, and he will be
able to make a better fight, until — even though it be after many struggles and
many defeats — the rope will snap, his limbs will be free, and he will slay his
enslaver. When a man has created a vice by evil desire, evil thought, and evil
act, he, its creator, can also be its destroyer, by good desire, good thought,
and good act. Thread by thread the rope of karma is twisted; thread by thread
the rope of karma may be untwisted; none but man himself creates his destiny,
none else compels . Take courage, then, all ye who find your present tied and
bound by your past; fear not, be of good courage, exert to the very utmost all
the strength you have; and you shall inevitably free yourselves, and stand
erect as masters where now you crawl as slaves. For law is law, and by the same
law by which we bound ourselves shall we now assuredly free ourselves; the law
remains the same, and that which in ignorance we wrought by it shall we now
through knowledge undo by it, and none can say us nay.
The third question of this group is one which often seems
to disturb the mind of the student; must not a vicious man, who continues to
live viciously, come back in another life yet more vicious, and so on and on ?
There are certain counteracting forces which have to be considered. In the
first place unhappiness follows on vice, to some extent in this world, to a
[Page 15] great extent in the next. The drunkard, the sensualist, develop a
bloated, coarsened body, with shaken nerves and ruined health. How often may
such an one be heard to regret his folly, and to declare that if he could live
his life over again, he would live it differently. Experience teaches, in spite
of our wilfulness, and the disregarded law bruises the evildoer.
The suffering grows keener on the other side of death, as the scorpion of evil desire stings its nurturer, and the man is forced to recognize that he is living in a world of law, where he may dash himself against the barriers but cannot break them. When he passes from the intermediate world into the heavenly, every seed of good he has within him grows into flower; all that there is of pure and loving in him develops and increases: when the heaven-life is over, the good side of him is strengthened, his faculties are improved. On his return to earth he also brings with him the result of his sad experience as a shrinking from the evil in which before he delighted. The memory of suffering endured, burnt into the soul, has become a cause for avoidance of the evil which induced it, and thus, by the action of law, is a change brought about in the attitude of the man towards that particular vice. Again, humanity as a whole is slowly carried forward in the great current of evolution, and the evil-doer is carried with it, though he may retard his own progress, almost to the point of stationariness; but this wilful setting of a part against the whole, the insolent setting of the individual will against the universal, causes a friction that becomes intolerably painful, and at last ceases by the strong compulsion of this pain. Or again, the evil-doer reads a book, hears a discourse, meets a person, that arouses in him a recognition of the folly of the course he is pursuing, opens his eyes to the suffering he is creating for himself, [Page 16] and stirs his intelligence and his will into an effort to change. Or again, the disapproval of those he loves and honors, the wish to gain affection instead of incurring dislike, these act upon him as a new cause to cease from evil and to do good. Or yet again, the mere fact of his own growth, the unfolding, however slow, of the divine Spirit which is his deepest Self, inevitably quickens the inborn tendency to good and causes a struggle against evil. Man's tendency is upwards not downwards, and only by doing violence to his own nature can a man grovel in a dust-heap instead of walking with face uplifted to the sun.
"Are we not really compelled by an iron
necessity?" There is but one necessity which binds the universe — the
loving Will of its Emanator to raise it to perfection and bliss. As God's very
Life is the life in His worlds, that Life lifts them ever to higher and fuller
expression of Beauty, of Good, of Happiness. Evolution is the essence of that Will, and
sooner or later, as the magnetized needle sets itself to the Pole, so must
man's will set itself to the divine, whereof it is indeed a part. Man is at
strife with himself, and hence the turmoil and the pain. When he sees his
lasting happiness, the substance instead of the shadow, then will he be at one
with himself and one with Divinity, and enter into the Peace.
http://www.theosophical.ca/adyar_pamphlets/AdyarPamphlet_No13.pdf
On YouTube:
Stephen Hawking: Does God Exist?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-jQUHUF1MU&feature=related
On YouTube:
Stephen Hawking: Does God Exist?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-jQUHUF1MU&feature=related
No comments:
Post a Comment